Laserfiche WebLink
threshold of 23 square feet. <br />The Planning Staff recommended approval of a 377 square foot variance or 3.5% over <br />the 30% impervious coverage requirement with conditions. <br />Chair Duncan asked if the Planning Commission would agree to a condition that the boat <br />and trailer (and other equipment) be stored in the new building. <br />Member Traynor asked if this was a smaller 2 stall garage (yes) Does the garage need to <br />be 20 feet wide to store a boat? (City Planner Paschke noted that there is other equipment <br />to be stored.) This may be a departure form what other development has occurred in the <br />neighborhood. <br />Member Peper asked what the exterior material will be. (Vinyl and no brick) <br />Member Bakeman asked why the details in the application where late. 1W. Norman <br />Gregg, 1137 County Road B2, stated the will remove a portion of the concrete east of the <br />driveway. He said he lives on a very busy street, requiring additional turning movements <br />and reeds additional storage space. Sussel will build the new building with a hip roof and <br />vinyl siding. <br />Member Stone asked if the boat could be stored indoors (applicant hopes to have <br />everything indoors — the garage was broken into twice). <br />Member Peper asked if a new shed could be built with a loft? t? ( not proposed by <br />applicant) <br />There was no public comment offered. <br />Chairman Duncan closed the hearing. <br />Motion: Member Stone moved, second by Member Bakemar% to recommend approval <br />of 377 square foot or a 3.5% impervious surface coverage) VARIANCE to Section <br />1004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction of a 480 square foot <br />detached accessory building (storage building) in the rear yard at 1137 County road B2, <br />based on the findings of Section 5 and the conditions (with a replacement of condition <br />"'E" with "required boat and equipment storage in the garage of new accessory building) <br />and necessary impervious area reductions of Section 6 of the project report dated July 9, <br />2003. <br />Ayes* 4 <br />Nays: 1 <br />Motion carried; 4 -1 <br />