My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0407_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0407_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 1:08:05 PM
Creation date
10/21/2011 12:54:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. "Could use ail lust agree to reduce our wages a little bit to cover our <br />deficit ?" <br />We could. We estimate that if every city employee reduced their <br />wages and salary by 10% that would cover our projected deficit. If <br />this were a short -term problem, I would recommend considering <br />that.. However, I don't think this is a short -term situation. And <br />unless every employer did the sane thing in reducing their <br />employees" wages 10% - which is not happening - then sore, <br />perhaps many, of our employees will go elsewhere where they can <br />earn a market pay gate. If we are looking at a long-terrrl situation, <br />as i believe we are, I suggest it is best to pay the right number of <br />people fairly, rather than pay everyone a reduced amount. <br />6. 'Why don -Y you think this is just a short - term, situation? Won't the <br />state aver faro vide state aid to Roseville again?" <br />I don't know -- at this point no one knows for certain -- but it sure <br />doesn't look like it. Let nine explain. <br />I expect the state legislature will let Minneapolis and St. Paul keep <br />some of their state aid. This is because they are large cities that <br />have statewide significance and because the state legislature has <br />given then many terns of millions of dollars in state aid for many <br />years. (Minneapolis and St. Paul receive much more state aid per <br />resident than Roseville does.) Minneapolis and St. Paul have <br />come to rely upon state aid for a large part of their operating <br />budget. I think Minneapolis and St. Paul will lose lots of state aid <br />but not all of it. <br />I also expect the state legislature will authorize some state aid to <br />hundreds of rural communities in Minnesota. This is because, <br />being small towns in rural areas, they may lack a solid tax base of <br />their own and consequently they, too, have become very dependent <br />on large amounts of state aid over the years. For those reasons <br />rural cities may continue to receive some reduced amount of state <br />aid to provide essential city services. <br />Roseville and a few other suburbs, on the other hand, have solid <br />tax bases and have not historically received huge amounts of state <br />aid from the state legislature. There is talk in the legislature about <br />changing the formula by which state aid is provided to cities. But I- <br />seriously doubt Roseville will see this kind of general purpose state <br />aid again under any needs- based funding formula. Remember: the <br />State has a 4 billion deficit it needs to address. Reducing state aid <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.