2003_0602_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2 d. Planning File 3468: Request by Manuel Gutierrez, 421 Crescent Lane for a 3 corner side yard setback VARIANCE to Section 1004.02D to allow construction 4 of a detached garage closer to the property line than the principle building. 5 6 Acting Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke 7 provide a summary of the prof ec t report dated May 7, 2003. 8 The City Manned indicated that Manuel Gutierrez has requested a 3 foot variance to 10 Section 1004.01A7 (Location) and Section 1004.02D4 (Side Yard Setback Adjacent a Public Street) to allow construction of 24 foot by 30 foot (720 sq. ft.) detached accessory 12 building (garage) at 421 Crescent Lane. 13 14 The proposed improvement to the Gutierrez parcel attempts to meet the goals and 15 objectives of the Housing Ilan. Specifically, the Housing plan encourages reinvestment 16 into existing housing to provide increased functionality to retain families within the 17 community to maintain a quality neighborhood. The proposed detached accessory 18 building would provide a 24' x 30' two car detached garage. 1 20 Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of the project report, 21 staff recommends approval of a 13 foot variance to Section 1004.01 A7 and 1004.02D4 of 22 the Roseville City Code to allow construction of a detached accessory building at 421 31 Crescent Cane} subject to the following conditions: 5 a. The applicant locating the lot's property pins and based on that, developing a scaled site plan with dimensions for structures and driveway, thus allowing the 7 Community Development Department to verify the lot's impervious coverage. 8 29 b. The parcel being limited to 3,528 square feet of impervious coverage, which 30 could require a reduction in the size of the proposed addition to the house. 31 c. The detached accessory structure being setback a minimum of 7 Feet from the 33 north (side yard) property 1 ine and 27 feet from the Irene Street (east -corner 34 street) property line. 35 d. The existing garage and driveway 'being removed within one year of the approval 37 date of the variance and the drainage being redesigned to reduce pending in the 38 yard, creating rain garden infiltration, and sheet flog to the south yard area as 39 illustrated in the applicant's landscape plan dated 04/04103 40 41 e. The review and approval of a building permit consistent: with the approved plans 42 and variance. The new building to match the existing building in color and/or 43 matefials. 44 Sally Gutierrez, applicant, noted the existing drive and one car garage is deteriorated and 45 must be removed. In the future an addition to the west side of the house would be added. 46 A 72 inch separation between the new garage and the 'louse 1s minimal. There is a grade