Laserfiche WebLink
B. Advance notice. <br />The worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN), a federal law that aims <br />advance notice to employees in situations of large plant closings or mass layoffs, does NOT <br />apply to local goverrnaent entities. Even though stag and federal law are silent about <br />providing local govenunent employees with an advance notice of pending layoff, the city <br />should consult its own personnel policies, civil service rules and/or union contracts. These <br />documents may require that the city provide an advance notice to employees. In addition, <br />there may be other benefits to providing advance notice. For example, employees who feel <br />the city is doing what it can to treat them fairly and humanely may be less inclined to file <br />lawsuits, grievances or contest the layoff. <br />C. Return to work 1 recall rights. <br />There are no state or federal requirements addressing the recall of city employees who were <br />laid off. However, the laws that govern state agencies seem to require that a systematic <br />method be used, perhaps in accordance with a union contract provision. Alon g dose lines, it <br />is a good idea for the city to determine its `'call- bank" Mersa in advance and have it approved <br />by the City Council so the city can show that the method used was systematic and consistent. <br />Again, a city needs to be sure to review it's personnel policies, civil service rrdes and/or <br />contracts as these documents may outline a procedure to follow when calling employees back <br />to work. By using a systematic method, the city can ensure that any protected status <br />employees (e.g., vegans, minorities, disabled employees) are tmted fairly. <br />D. Using volunteers after the layoff. <br />For some cities, volunteers are a way to get work done after an employee layoff has occurred. <br />It i y <br />s important that the city ensure, however, that any volunteer doing work previously y <br />by an employee, is qualified to do such work. In other words, the volunteer should <br />have the same gmMicat ions that would be required of an employee in that position <br />(backgmund, trasn,ng, education, certifications, etc.) If an employee who does Snowplowing <br />is required - � g <br />to have a commercial drivers license, then a volunteer doing the same function <br />(even if the volunteer is doing it on a very occasional and sporadic basis ) should have a <br />commercial driver }s license. <br />Cities need to be aware of the potential liabilities created when using volunteers to re p lace <br />employees. Most volunteers will not be covered by the city's workers compensation <br />i <br />insurance because they are not G`employe'es" of the city. It ImPortant to note that rovidin <br />F g <br />volunteers with a nominal payment for their services does not snake then, employees i.e. <br />eligible for workers compensation coverage). If the city intends to use volunteers extensively ensily <br />to replace laid off employees, t may wish to consider volunteer accident coverage, Such <br />coverage provides a "no-fault" type benefit to volunteers insured while conducting ork for <br />r <br />the city. More information about such coverage is available in the LM IT Risk Management <br />Information: Covering the City's Volunteers. <br />_9_ <br />