2003_0609_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report, staff' recommends approval of a 70 foot variance to Section 1 004.01 A7 and allow a joint 75 foot long driveway to remain Section 703.04B2 of the Roseville City Code for ,lames l uef e`er to allow construction of a detached accessory ui 1 di ng at 896 Parker Avenue, subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant using the lot's survey and property pins and based on that, supplying a scaled site plan with dimensions for structures and driveway for building permit application, thus allowing the Community Development Department to verify the setbacks, driveway locations as per the variance request, and size of new structures. B. The detached accessory structure being setback a minimum of ` l 0 feet from the west (side yard) property line and 69 feet from the Parker Avenue property line. C. The joint existing driveway, varying from zero (0) feet to a 2 foot setback from the cast property line is allowed to remain to a point 75 feet south of the front property 1 ine along Parker Avenue. As part of the building permit application, Mr. lueffer must provide and show a Counter Recorder's recorded copy of a perpetual access easement in favor of the adjoining property owner to the cast for access use the j o i nt dri veway, D. The existing garage and driveway being removed within one year of the approval date of the variance. The slope and drainage must be redesigned and re- landscaped to reduce and/or retain surface run -off and roof drainage on the uef"fer lot by creating on site infiltration areas. E. A landscape plan being provided that illustrates how new plantings will visually soften and partially screen the proposed garage from the Parker Avenue frontage. E. The review and approval of a building permit being consistent with the approved plans and variance. The new building to match the existing building color and/or materials. 7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 7.1 On May 7, 2003, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Kueffer request. At the heaving, no citizens were present to address the Commission. The property owner and City Planner were present to answer any questions of the Commission. 7.2 The Commission voted (4 -0) to recommend approval of the request by Mr. I ueffer for a VARIANCE to Section 1004.01A7 and Section 703.04B2 of the Roseville City odoa. based on the findings in Section 5 and conditions in Section 6 of ` the project report data May 7, 2 003 . PF3469 - RCA 06/02/03- Page 5 of 6