Laserfiche WebLink
tf <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />to <br />11 <br />1? <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />1 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />0 <br />1 <br />2 <br />23 <br />4 <br />S <br />6 <br />27 <br />28 <br />9 <br />30 <br />31 <br />Vice Chair Mulder asked for new garage design details. <br />Member Mulder a losed the hearing since there were no further comments. <br />Vice Chair Mulder asked if this was done because or by the applicant. He also expressed <br />concern with the garage materials and design. <br />Thomas Pasehke explained that this minor subdivision ease was previously discussed <br />with the Council} agreeing to eliminate the driveway and garage behind the house. <br />Member 13akeman asked ho % %. steps will be added. <br />Vice Chair Mulder asked what the hardship is in this eltise. Staff` must review structure <br />plans. <br />Motion: Member Traynor moved, seconded by Member 1 psen, to recommend approval <br />(approval with modifications or denial) ol` a 69 foot VARIANCE to Sections 1004.01A7 <br />7 <br />and 703 .o4B2 of the Roseville City Code for .lames Kueffer, to allow construction of a <br />24' x 4' detached accessory building (garage) at 896 Parker Avenue in the front yard <br />and to retain the existing joint driveway to a point no further south than 75 feet from the <br />Parker Avenue }property line} based on the findings in Section 5 and conditions of <br />Section 6 of the project report dated May 7* 2003, and further that the design plan is to be <br />reviewed by City staff. <br />Member Bakeman said she was bothered by the size of the structure in the front yard. <br />}yes: 4 <br />Nays: o <br />Motion carried, <br />