My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0331_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0331_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2011 10:21:36 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 9:44:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i o, rim <br />Property Records and Revenue <br />Jusepli M ansky, Elections Dik isinn Ni anager <br />722 G vernmant Center Wvsi <br />,90 west Kellogg Boulevard <br />St Paul, N[N 5i 10 20- 169 <br />February 6, Zoo <br />Carolyn Curti <br />City of Roseville <br />660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MINI 55113 <br />[dear Carolyn, <br />Rhone: 651 -266 -2171 <br />Fax: 651-266-2 177 <br />TTDR: X66 -21 70 <br />You have indicated that the City of Roseville is considering adoption of a <br />municipal primary, to be held for the first time in 2006. You have asked about the <br />impact of the primary when held ® in the even - numbered years. The following its a <br />brief discussion of this issue. <br />The object of a primary is to reduce the field of candidates to a maximum of two <br />in the general election. From an administrative standpoint, this is useful. There <br />are normally a large number of offices and questions on the general election <br />ballot in an even - numbered year. We have a limited amount of space on the <br />ballot and periodically fill both sides in the state generai election. Having <br />municipal offices on the ballot without a primary increases the probability that two <br />ballots will be required for the general election. My best estimate is than a second <br />ballot in the general election would increase F osevill e's election costs by <br />approximately $6,000. This would cover the costs of programming, printing, <br />testing, and counting the second ballot. Based on the recent experience in <br />Hennepin and Sherburne counties using two ballots, our preference would be to <br />avoid this situation if possible. <br />On the other hand, there is ample space on the primary ballet for a large number <br />of municipal candidates, given the fact that there are generally a small number of <br />nonpartisan offices on the primary ballot. Again, from a purely administrative <br />standpoint, it is preferable to have the lamer number of municipal candidates on <br />the primary ballot than on the general election ballot, simply because there is <br />less competition for space on the primary ballot* <br />All lame cities in Minnesota conduct municipal pdmaries. in Ramsey County, this <br />inctudes the cities of Saint Paul and Maplewood. In those communities, voters . . <br />SR <br />have an expectation that they will be asked to narrow the field of candidates for <br />the general election at the primary. This situation is not uncommon. In 2001, 16 <br />Minnesota's First Dome R,urle County <br />[ 1+;11wr 111111 .l WRIIIIIIIII + +I I- I ° Whi + ++11%.11rsl"r s ++141.11' <br />v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.