My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0331_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0331_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2011 10:21:36 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 9:44:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Message <br />From: Beets, Neal <br />Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:58 PAS <br />To: *RV Council <br />CC: Miller, Chris; Curti, Carolyn <br />Subject: F : Cost of a Primary Election <br />All, the cost to the city for holding a primary election, meal <br />- - - -- Original Message-- <br />Miller,, Chris <br />Seat: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3 :19 PM <br />To: Beets, Neal <br />Cc: Curti, Carolyn <br />Subject: Cost of a Primary Election <br />Neal, <br />Page of 1 <br />As a follow -up to last right's discussion on the cost of a conducting a primary election, Carolyn and 1 <br />met to review the applicable costs. You may recall that two different figures were presented; $8,000 and <br />$20,000. Technically both figures are correct, depending on hover you measure fixed costs. <br />Beginning with the 2003 election, the estimated direct costs of conducting a pnm <br />yr ary election is $10,000 <br />— 12,000. This includes costs for election judges, printing ballots, and mailing absentee ballots, but does <br />not include indirect, fixed costs for full -tithe staff (Carolyn, Jill, Gretchen, etc.) which we incur whether <br />there is a primary or not. <br />En the longer run, beginning with the 2006 election, the "City -cost" issue of whether to conduct a <br />primary becomes loss significant. Begai mng in 2006, the local elections will fall 'in the same year as <br />the general election and we will be required to hold a primary regardless. Then, the only potential <br />savings from not having a city primary will result from not having to print ballots for local candidates, <br />or mail out absentee ballots. These costs are rniriirnal and are not likely to exceed 1,000. <br />Thus, the direct cost of a city primary for 2003 and 2005 is $10,100 - $12,000. if you include staff time <br />in your cost calculation, them the cost of a city primary in 2003 and 2005 is about $20,000. Beginning in <br />2006) the cost of a city primary is minimal because the city must hold the state primary election anyway. <br />3/27/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.