My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0224_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0224_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2011 11:50:11 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 11:37:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IMEWTOWL61 - <br />4. 1 Section 1004.01A6 of'the Roseville City Code (Maximum Total Surface Area) affords <br />each single family residential property owner a 30% impervious coverage based upon the <br />total lot size. In the case of'the Williams propertyi this allowance cannot exceed 3,1115 <br />square feet without an, approved, variance. <br />0 <br />4.2 The William home is a 19,50, Bungalow situated on a 10,382 square folot lot. The home <br />has a footprint of 1,029 square feet�-, a detached, garage (under construction) of 864 square <br />feet- dn"veway pavement of 1, 1, 84 square feet-1 and an 80, square folot garden shed. Given <br />these current site conditions the Williams haive a current impervious, coverage of 31,157 <br />square feet or 30.,4i%,, square footage meets the threshold, allowance for 30% coverage. <br />The proposed improvemcnt, constructi*ng a 256 square foolt bedroom addition on to the <br />0 <br />rear of the home, would br,ing the total impervious coverage of the parcel to 3,4131 square <br />feet or 32%. <br />a <br />5.2 In, 2003 Mr. Williams applied for a building permit to construct the bedroom additioln <br />onto the rear (west side) of' his home. A review was completed by the Building Inspecto <br />V <br />and City Planner that determi'ned the addition would exceed the, allowable ftnpervious <br />coverage for the parcel by 298 square feet. I <br />The current situation affirords limited, options for Mr. Williams. The Staff did consider <br />suggesting a reduction in the detached accesisory structure size;, however, it was too fj <br />along in the construction process. Another option afforded Williams, is to reduce <br />portion of'th,e driveway; howeve�r, it is not feasible to reduce the driveway by the 29� <br />square feet necessary to allow the bedroom addition. <br />PF31452 — RCA 02i2i4O3 - Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.