My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-10-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-10-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 8:51:43 AM
Creation date
10/25/2011 8:47:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/25/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Traffic Control Devices Stop Sign Implementation <br />Purpose <br />Regulatory sign that is used to assign right -of <br />way at an intersection. Only recommended for <br />installation if specific guidelines are met in <br />accordance with the Minnesota Manual on <br />Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD). Stop <br />signs should not be used for speed control or <br />volume reduction and should not be installed on <br />the major street unless justified by an <br />engineering report. <br />R1 -1 <br />Source: FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices <br />Effects <br />Volumes <br />Little or no effect <br />Speed <br />Little or no reduction in speed, speed possibly increases due to drivers speeding <br />up to make up for time lost at the stop sign <br />Traffic Noise and Air <br />Noise is increased near the intersection due to the increase activity of <br />acceleration. Air quality worsens due to deceleration, idling and acceleration <br />Traffic Safety <br />Possible increase in crashes, possibly due to the stop signs being unexpected or <br />deemed unnecessary, therefore encouraging rolling stops or by instilling a false <br />sense of security in crossing motorists and pedestrians. <br />Advantages <br />• Inexpensive installation costs (do require continual maintenance costs) <br />• Defines driver's right -of -way <br />• Increase opportunity for pedestrians to cross the roadway <br />• May discourage cut - through traffic <br />Disadvantages <br />• Can cause negative traffic safety impacts if sign is not warranted <br />• May result in mid -block speeding <br />• Increasing levels of intersection control are associated with increased <br />frequency of crashes. <br />• Difficult to enforce full stop control compliance <br />• Could result in increase in speeds between the signs as drivers try to make up <br />for lost time <br />Problems Targeted <br />• At intersections where right -of -way is confusing <br />Design <br />• Guidelines need to be met as established in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform <br />Traffic Control Devices <br />• In most cases the street carrying the lowest volumes should be stopped to <br />minimize the number of vehicles stopping <br />APRIL 2005 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.