Laserfiche WebLink
Second. <br />Correspondi,ngly, there is also concern about the possibility of <br />thy. Permi 't being transferred to another individua" shoul d Trish Curtiss <br />X <br />sell or ren,t, out the home at 1967 Aldine w.11thin the term; of the time <br />limitations on the permit. <br />If' the permit 11,s conisidered to "run with the land," then a new owner <br />or, even a renter could move into the home and take over this beauty shop <br />business. M,gybe another operator would observe the same restrictions that <br />Trish Curtiss has agreed to, maybe not. The neighbors would then find <br />themselves in the undesired positions of watchdogs and whistle blowers. <br />2, Sol it is add Itionially requested that any permit, now or in <br />11 <br />the future, be g,rant,ed specificall'y to Patricia Curtiss for <br />specific length, of <br />a spec... 1 0 time. <br />lhird : Trish Curtiss originally requested approval of IN part tine" hours, <br />(approx.) 15- 0 hours" ("per week, 1 assume,). Attached is a copy of the <br />information sheet, she distri"buted at the Planning Commilssion 1-learing. <br />When the, Rioseville Planning Commission considered-her application, VOLUAlNTARIELY <br />l <br />A'A""I' 11" U1 A REQUEST the Plann.1ng Commission voted to recommend approval <br />of 30 bolu�r's f'olr the operation of the business . <br />r% q. <br />1) 4 It is therefore also requested t,h,^,.,t the Roseville City Council <br />grant approval, for thiis home beauty, shop to operate no more than <br />2-0 hours per wee'A. and that such hiours are specifically stated at <br />the ti,m,e of your vote.1 <br />I believc these re�quelsts will meet your requirements of remaining U within <br />A <br />the conf-."nes of' the city ordinance wilille meet in the major concerns of the <br />Q1 <br />surroundinZ, neighbors and protectincy their interests. <br />It :1[s may opinion that there are sufficient reasonable objections to justify <br />den -al of this perm-Ait anid that there are sufficient reasonable questions <br />left, unanswered to justify continuation, of' this application. If you S&ncerely <br />believe lit -'L`,s not within your power to deny the perm.11t. then I hope you <br />will understand why we feel the need for the above specifications and that <br />you ulill, -include then,, when, you vote. <br />Thank you for, your cons iderat "lion., <br />Sincerely, <br />Frances J:. Reitz <br />