Laserfiche WebLink
COMP 41 p g <br />ae <br />uter Cxt,yt Casio No 41 2115 0 5 <br />There are three quesitillons for the Planning, commissionso <br />1,) Is, 141i't appropriate to apply the setback standards from <br />the Business districts,,i as they have been applied on other <br />qi <br />friele-standing parcels, in, the SC District? <br />2) Givien the fact that there, is an existing 'internal <br />traffic conglestion, problem on this siite (a shopping of over <br />$I <br />300,oao square feeit),, Is it reasonable to limit the <br />development of' this relatively small remnant parcel,, which <br />is under seplaratie ownershipos? <br />3i) more generally, does the project as proposed reasonably <br />meet the, Cityll adopted standards*97 <br />We recommend approval of the Special Use. Permit granting setbacks <br />9 <br />,less, than the 811C standards with the following conditions: <br />1) 'Th,ati the, parking Jolt be designed as shown on the <br />sulx6itted, plans with one�wa,y parking and s igned <br />appropriatielys <br />2) That landsicape and, util ity plans be approved by C ity <br />staf f 0 <br />13 1 That, the required roadway, easement f or County Road B-2 <br />r 41 i <br />er m y the Cunty and C <br />be, dedicated as detined b o • ity staf f 41 <br />