Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 17,2011 <br /> Page 11 <br /> along County Road C. Ms. Harper opined that there was no justification to de- <br /> stroying a neighborhood for that option. <br /> Mitchell, Linda,2852 Huron Street (4 houses south of county road c-2 <br /> If the point is to get additional east/west connectivity, Ms. Mitchell questioned <br /> why additional lanes weren't added to County Road C, rather than this attempted <br /> solution. Ms. Mitchell advised that there were congestion issues on County Road <br /> C, as well as in front of the High School, and since those were two main tho- <br /> roughfares through the community, it didn't make sense to her to not increase ca- <br /> pacity on those two roads. Ms. Mitchell further opined that Josephine Road was <br /> not unlike other metropolitan roads around a lake that experienced excessive traf- <br /> fic. <br /> Patricia Rantanen,2846 Churchhill Street <br /> Ms. Rantanen advised that she had spoken to several City Councilmembers since <br /> last week's meeting, and had some additional thoughts on design capacity stan- <br /> dards on MSA roads, and whether they were set by the state. Ms. Rantanen <br /> opined that, if C-2 were opened, it would totally disregard design standards for <br /> MSA roads. Ms. Rantanen opined that it would cost approximately $1 million for <br /> a project to open C-2 safely; and that this was not in the budget, nor was it on any <br /> priority documents or resident survey documents. Ms. Rantanen further opined <br /> that if this money was going to be spent that it be taken out of reserves; however, <br /> she spoke in support of using funds for projects that would benefit the greater <br /> community, such as walkability, through installation of sidewalks on those streets <br /> currently without them; and through addressing traffic congestion in front of <br /> Roseville Area High School—both better projects and uses of$1 million than this <br /> project. <br /> Bob Henniker, 1241 County Road C-2 <br /> Mr. Henniker spoke in opposition to opening C-2; opining that there could be ac- <br /> cidents on the steep hill on C-2 daily; and questioned why this issue kept coming <br /> up when he thought it was a dead issue. <br /> Ms. Cere Peterson (Husband: Tyler), 1020 West County Road C-2 <br /> Ms. Peterson noted the long-term family-owned home of her parents, and her <br /> family's moving back into that home due to the quality of life in Roseville from <br /> its educational facilities and other amenities. However, Ms. Peterson advised that <br /> her one frustration was the City Council allowing this issue to continue as long as <br /> it had, serving to create further neighborhood battles. While hearing people say <br /> they wanted to "share," Ms. Peterson opined that they weren't doing so; and <br /> through their blatant wearing of red for solidarity tonight, it served as additional <br /> evidence supporting their unwillingness to share. Ms. Peterson opined that, if <br /> opening C-2 was the right decision, it would have been made by now; and even <br /> though money was spent on traffic studies supporting not opening C-2, the City <br /> and neighborhoods seemed to be stuck in a parliamentary procedure quagmire, <br />