My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1017
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2011 9:43:44 AM
Creation date
10/26/2011 9:43:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/17/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 17,2011 <br /> Page 2 <br /> noted that this request, provided as a bench handout attached hereto and made a <br /> part hereof, was requesting City staff to prepare a fact sheet of estimated financial <br /> impacts of current proposals before the City Council and as related to the 2012 <br /> budget. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg asked that this information be provided by staff prior to the Octo- <br /> ber 24, 2011 Public Hearing related to the proposed bond issue for proposed park <br /> improvements and a new fire station; and sought further clarification whether <br /> public comments at that hearing would be strictly focused on the merits of the <br /> bonding proposals. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that the Public Hearing was for the purpose of the City's in- <br /> tent to issue bonds, and comments would preferably be confined to the City's use <br /> of its Port Authority to issue the bonds. However, Mayor Roe advised that, while <br /> several public comment opportunities would be provided in November prior to <br /> the City's adoption of its final budget and levy in December, if the comments <br /> were related to the bond issue and its impacts to the budget they could be heard on <br /> October 24, 2011. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned if Mr. Grefenberg hadn't also previously <br /> requested information on impacts of the reduced Market Value Homestead Credit <br /> (MVHC) and if he didn't wish to add this to his formal written request. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg, from his personal perspective, advised that he would leave that <br /> up to the City Council for a response, since he kept getting mixed messages as to <br /> how and/or if the MVHC impacted Roseville residents. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, City Manager Malinen advised that <br /> the MCHC may impact Roseville taxpayers, but that it was hard to determine at <br /> this time until all values were finalized by Ramsey County, allowing City staff to <br /> only be able to make an estimate at this time. <br /> Councilmember McGehee referenced a recent article in the Minneapolis <br /> Star/Triune spelling out MVHC in general; and further questioned why this re- <br /> quested information had not already been provided by staff this week. <br /> City Manager Malinen advised that staff was working on compiling the requested <br /> information; and anticipated that it would be available by Wednesday of this <br /> week. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that instead of attempting a date certain, Wednesday of next <br /> week be used as the intended date. Mayor Roe briefly summarized the legislation <br /> and calculations used in determining MVHC and recent legislation enacted during <br /> the Special Session earlier this year. Mayor Roe advised that further discussions <br /> on any impacts of MVHC would occur as the 2012 budget process continued. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.