My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1010
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2011 9:55:35 AM
Creation date
10/26/2011 9:55:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 10,2011 <br /> Page 17 <br /> • nation using established criteria rather than through making reactive decisions. <br /> Ms. Rantanen opined that this reactionary method was irresponsible and set up a <br /> recipe for micro and macro traffic problems. Ms. Rantanen opined that there was <br /> no evidence to-date to support opening County Road C-2, but that evidence was <br /> provided indicating the numerous conflicts with the City's identified and estab- <br /> lished priorities and budgets. <br /> If the City Council was to approve opening County Road C-2, Ms. Rantanen <br /> asked that they not send her any more surveys for a response, since they were ap- <br /> parently not listening to what she was saying in her responses. Ms. Rantanen <br /> asked that this issue finally be brought to closure permanent. <br /> Jeff Strobeck, 1297 W County Road C-2 <br /> Mr. Strobeck opined that the reason for this issue coming forward was to address <br /> Josephine Road residents and their preferences for calming traffic on their street, <br /> even though studies continue to indicate it is operating below capacity. Ms. Stro- <br /> beck asked that the City Council vote "no" for opening County Road C-2, opining <br /> that there was no money in the budget to do so; and that he couldn't personally af- <br /> ford the additional assessment on his property taxes. <br /> Mr. Strobeck asked if semaphores had been included in the cost estimates pro- <br /> • vided by Ms. Bloom; and suggested several options for his fellow Josephine Road <br /> residents: <br /> • Put in a three-way or all-way stop sign at Josephine Road and Fernwood Ave- <br /> nue; <br /> •` Lower the speed limit to 25 mph; or <br /> • Re-stripe County Road C from Lexington to Hamline Avenues for a four-lane <br /> road to facilitate traffic loads. <br /> Mr. Strobeck further opined that any additional road assessments along County <br /> Road C-2 would greatly and negatively impact property owners, when current in- <br /> comes were generally down 8.9%; and respectfully asked for a"no" vote from his <br /> elected officials. <br /> Lars Ever, 1211 County Road C-2 <br /> Mr. Evers questioned the cost for a stoplight at County Road C-2 and Lexington <br /> Avenue, as suggested in the traffic study between now and 2030 if County Road <br /> C-2 were opened; and if those costs were considered in this discussion. Mr. Evers <br /> also expressed his lack of interest, as a resident on the north side of County Road <br /> C-2, for an 8' pathway eating into his front yard. <br /> Stewart Schwiff, 1233 Josephine Road <br /> Mr. Schwiff asked: <br /> 1) When is road construction due to begin on County Road C-2 as part of the Jo- <br /> • sephine Woods project; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.