My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1010
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2011 9:55:35 AM
Creation date
10/26/2011 9:55:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 10,2011 <br /> Page 19 <br /> • meet those engineering criteria, and installation of one to address right-of-way <br /> conflicts if not determined necessary based on those warrants, had actually been <br /> found to create more of an issue, since people would not stop and it would not ad- <br /> dress their speed anyway if they chose not to stop since they perceived no danger. <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned if the City Council was to take action, irres- <br /> pective of the study, to install a stop sign at Fernwood Avenue and Josephine <br /> Road, would the City be liable. <br /> City Attorney Gaughan advised, that in studying a related issue, it had been de- <br /> termined that such action could be deemed as a discretionary function of the City <br /> Council, and that the City Council would probably not be liable. <br /> Related to the nature of County Road C-2 being a State Aid Road, Ms. Bloom ad- <br /> vised that she would like to follow-up further on liability issues. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Ms. Bloom confirmed that 2001 traffic warrant le- <br /> vels did not support installation of a stop sign at the intersection of Fernwood <br /> Avenue and Josephine Road. <br /> Related to speed, Ms. Bloom noted that speed limits were set by the State Com- <br /> e missioner of Transportation, and 25 mph was only allowed on parkways, and oth- <br /> erwise 30 mph the minimum speed limit, which was the current speed limit on Jo- <br /> sephine Road. If the City was to request a traffic study, it would be completed on <br /> the 85th percentile of speed of speeds on Josephine Road, and Ms. Bloom advised <br /> that recent studies had already indicated that the 85th percentile on Josephine <br /> Road is 35 mph. Ms. Bloom advised that safer roads were the result of speed lim- <br /> its set at a safe limit, and when studies are done, they usually come back with a <br /> higher number. <br /> Mayor Roe noted, as a public reminder, that the City Council had previously re- <br /> quested that the City's Public Works, Environment, and Transportation Commis- <br /> sion develop a city-wide traffic mitigation policy, currently being developed, and <br /> which would include various traffic safety mitigation methods based on a consis- <br /> tent and standard set of criteria. <br /> Regarding re-striping of County Road C as a four-lane road, Ms. Bloom advised <br /> that, while it had been built wide enough for four (4) lanes, studies have indicated <br /> that human nature and habit indicates that people will continue using the roads of <br /> their choice. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that, when construction projects and cost estimates are pro- <br /> vided, they include all anticipated costs for such a project, including driveway re- <br /> construction, curbing, curbs,trees, catch basins, hydrants, and all items that would <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.