My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1010
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2011 9:55:35 AM
Creation date
10/26/2011 9:55:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 10, 2011 <br /> Page 27 <br /> Ms. Bacon apologized if she had led anyone to believe that <br /> Y employee premiums <br /> were paid 100%; and noted that most employees paid a deductible out-of-pocket <br /> of$5,000 to $10,000. <br /> John Kysylyczyn,3083 N Victoria Street <br /> Mr. Kysylyczyn spoke more broadly to this issue, opining that the process for un- <br /> ion contracts was still screwed up in Roseville; and that the City Manger, as the <br /> City's negotiator was charged with negotiating at the direction of the City Council <br /> and their established goals, and then reporting back on those negotiations. Mr. <br /> Kysylyczyn opined that this was at least the way the process was supposed to <br /> work; however, the historical process for union negotiations that still seemed to <br /> be the norm was that the union's signed agreement was brought forward as a mat- <br /> ter of fact for the City Council to accept, without having the City Council setting <br /> priorities before hand. <br /> Regarding comparing with other cities and the private sector, Mr. Kysylyczyn <br /> opined that the other missing comparison was with other government entities with <br /> salary comparisons for like positions (e.g. snow plowing) such as Ramsey Coun- <br /> ty, the State of MN or other levels of government. Mr. Kysylyczyn noted that no <br /> information was presented to the City Council that considered that portion beyond <br /> city to city comparisons that served to isolate the City in a bubble. <br /> • While not having any conflicts with Ms. Bacon's information, Mr. Kysylyczyn <br /> suggested that there may be a conflict in asking her to bring forward recommen- <br /> dations to the City Council that personally and directly affected her, and adding <br /> undue pressure on her. Mr. Kysylyczyn suggested that a third party be brought <br /> into the process to avoid such a conflict. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned if Mr. Kysylyczyn had a model that uses <br /> such a third party negotiator; with Mr. Kysylyczyn responding that many cities, <br /> including the City of Maplewood, MN, used outside contractors for a portion or <br /> all of their human resource services. <br /> Carol Kester, SW Roseville <br /> At the request of Ms. Kester as to how many City employees were under Public <br /> Employers Retirement Association (PERA), Ms. Bacon responded that all City <br /> employees were under PERA, in accordance with state law. <br /> Ms. Kester advised that she was asking the questions based on Councilmember <br /> Johnson's comment about reviewing other pension plans; with Councilmember <br /> Johnson clarifying that he was asking to be educated on the City's pension plans. <br /> Ms. Kester opined that individual insurance premiums of $300 plus dollars per <br /> • month seemed high to her; with Ms. Bacon responding that the premiums were <br /> based on the number and amount of claims realized by the City, and opined that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.