Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the <br />City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, <br />Minnesota was duly held on the 10th day of February, 1986, at 7:30 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Cushman, Matson, Kehr, and <br />Demos, and the following were absent: Johnson. <br /> <br />Member Kehr introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 7861 <br /> <br />Finding of a Negative Declaration for a Full Environmental <br />Impact Statement--Centre Pointe Business Park. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City of Roseville is the responsible governmental <br />unit regarding the Centre pointe Business Park project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, As a result of the fact Centre pointe Business Park <br />requires a mandatory E.A.W. as a result of the magnitude of <br />parking, square footage and sanitary sewage; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City of Roseville has prepared the Environmental <br />Assessment Work Sheet; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City has reviewed the type, extent, and <br />irreversibility of the environmental effects; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City has reviewed the cumulative potential effects <br />of related or anticipated future projects; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City has reviewed the extent to which the <br />environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public <br />regulatory authorities; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City has reviewed the extent to which environmental <br />effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other <br />environmental studies undertaken by public agencies, or the <br />project proposal; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The City staff has prepared proposed findings of fact <br />and conclusions regarding this matter; and, <br />