My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1992_1012_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1992
>
1992_1012_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2011 10:23:24 AM
Creation date
10/28/2011 10:15:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1R.E'QUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE** 10-12-92 <br />ITEM NO. <br />30 'The Plannignig Comm, iss ion, on a 4-1 vote, recommended council <br />I <br />approval, of the attached ordinance amendments <br />4 On September 28, 19192,,i the City, Council directed the City <br />Attorney tio put the proposed amendments into proper ordinance <br />11 <br />f orm P1 New provisions relating, to political signs and <br />a <br />electronic, message signs have, been removed and will be <br />discussed, further along with auto dealer signs at the October <br />19, 1992 'Work Session. <br />40 <br />city Attiorney Comments: <br />11 2 <br />By reading, Chapter 14i with these amendments, apparently real <br />estate signs and polit. ical signs are only allowed 'in R-3- and <br />R-2 districts,,. <br />201 Nonconforming uses are controlled"�b3F Chapter 11,, Section <br />14.,,1,80 has, not been amended and, that refers to Chapter 11. <br />So everyone understands, 'we, enclose a copy of Chapter 11 ts, <br />be read in conjunction with, these amendments, <br />Alternatives: <br />r, 41 Approve the ordinance amendments, as recommended by thme <br />0 <br />Planning commission. <br />I inance amendments <br />2, DI en the y ord' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.