Laserfiche WebLink
JCity of ROSOVille/Fernwood Vacation# Case N'oe 24581 Page 4 <br />1 <br />I <br />(RCwD,) w Bill be, nieleded for the grading wiork, associated with the <br />*I <br />oval but as noted in their attached letter,, they expect th-i�, <br />a <br />pr0i:)ecit will result in iraproved, water quality for the pond. <br />Environmental impacts of' the proj ect were rev iewed by the <br />0 t 0 <br />Environmental Quality Board (EQB) as a, result of a peti ion <br />submitted by interested citizens,. Based on this review, a <br />01 <br />determination was made by the EQB that the project does not <br />a 6 <br />requi.re an Envilroinmental Assessmient Worksheet (EAW). <br />U <br />Biased on the didisicussion at the previous Planning Commission <br />41 <br />IF <br />meeting, four major issues, were raised concerning the vacation of <br />Fernwood Street <br />a <br />These two issues are directly. related to the street vacation <br />request and based on this information alone we would recommend <br />approval of' the vacation recruesite, <br />me <br />Ither issues have been raised which are not directly related tit <br />the request at hand, but we, have attempted to, address them anyway. <br />a 41 <br />4) Environmental Issues is No environmental permits are <br />needed and no, adverse, impacts are anticipated. In <br />4i <br />fact, RCWD believes the pro"ect will improve the water <br />I <br />quality of the neighboring wetland.,s <br />The vacation, of Fernwood does not pose a problem for these two <br />issues eith,eire We. recommend approval of the vacation requests <br />