Laserfiche WebLink
r ". & <br />G-Ar3.tage Development, Case No* 2244 <br />'a <br />TWI <br />91 OP <br />The issues involved wi th the project, at the March review were. <br />treatment of' the pondingi area, visitior parking, and internal green <br />Ii <br />space. All three isisues were addresseld in the revised plan at the <br />Pi <br />April meeitiing 0 <br />Is I <br />The reviseld plan, showed Sweeney Pond preserved int-act, with a <br />-9 <br />stiorm retentilion pond proposed in the northwest corner of the site <br />to treat runoff' before it gets into the larger pond. A trail was <br />proposed along, the edge of the pondi, <br />Surface 'Parking is moire <br />than required by <br />Code, <br />and is place <br />around, the siite more or <br />Iess conven, iently <br />to most <br />of the units <br />The intiernal circulat 'ion <br />was modit' i e,d to <br />eliminate a drg <br />lane at the east edge of <br />the site Th 'is frees up <br />some space fo <br />more grleien area in the setback and, sl Iffightly <br />larger <br />i nternal gree <br />areas as ell <br />R =*411il <br />III I Pill <br />