My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1992_0720_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1992
>
1992_0720_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2011 2:39:04 PM
Creation date
10/28/2011 2:37:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N-I M,cCarron's Blvd., (not those out of sight up Irene Street and Western Avenue). In fact, <br />1i <br />the relevant neighborhood is to large extent defined by the Sch�losser property. <br />Two houses on lots 1 & 2 is a possIbility. only because of'a,pprloved variances for lot 2, <br />which 'I's 10% beillow minimum area (co,mb�ined with the fact that a large portion of <br />a I I <br />triregularly-shapied lot 1 is property back up the hill 'is, what will make two houses on lots <br />1 & 2 cl�early out of conformity with "the nelighborhood," as an on-isite visift clearly reveals. <br />Granting of' variances req�u�irlels that hardship is established�. <br />91 The only Justification given for granting the variances, therefore the basis for hardship, <br />is that many properties to the north on Irene Street and Western Avenue do not meet <br />current code (that the Schlosser- property is not "wel�l�-suit'led" for platting can hardly be <br />*fth lot) <br />considered a "hardship"" to jousfify approval of variances so as, to squeeze in a fi <br />When those properties, were platted in the 1950's, they met the code that then existed <br />10 4 minim 'dth, per Rick jopke). <br />(101POOO ft,2 minimurn area and 410 ft * * um wl <br />*1 1 ioln. <br />The basis for Schlosser�'s hardshipis thus cal�l�ed into quest," <br />11 <br />Our verbal understanding with Matt Schlosser in December 19910 was that he would <br />not proceed on any development for at least five, years, leading us to Proceed with a, <br />$25-30 K addition that may, now look out at a house ten feet off our priolperty on lot, 1 <br />d <br />rather than down a slopi I ng wooded hill to a lake. <br />1�= <br />N <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.