|
6), - 19 PROCEDURES § 6.03[31
<br />91 See, elig., Valley View Civic Ass"n v. Zoning Bid. of Ad ustmen�t, 501 Pa. 550,
<br />462, A.21d 6137 (11983)-
<br />961n, re Creskio,, 400 Pa. 46,70, 1612 A.2d 219 (1960); Appeal of Buckingham
<br />Developers, Inc.,, 61 Pa. Commw. 408, 433 A.2d 931 (1981); Ramondo, v. Zoning
<br />Hearing Bid., 161 Pa. Commw, 242, 434 A.2d 204 (1981,); Rhode Island Trust Nat'l
<br />Blank v. East Providence Zoning Bid., of Review, 444 A.2d 862 (R.I. 1982); cf. City of
<br />East, Providence v. R.I. Hospital Trust Nat'l Blank, 505 A.2d 1,143 (R.I. 1986)
<br />(criticizing the failure to balance equities before requiring removal of nonconforming
<br />strucifure).
<br />Gram ',Beach, Assn v,. Town of Oild Orchard Beach., 516 A.2d 551 (Me. 1986)
<br />(variance, denied, even thiougl h this would cause a, $1.2, million drop in income because
<br />reasonable return does not, mean maximum return),.
<br />97 Otto V. Sitleinhilibler, 2,812 N.Y'. 711 t 24 N.E. 2d 851, (11939)- Inanelzi v. Zoning Bid.
<br />COP
<br />of Adjustment, 62 Pa. Commw. 101, 4,33 A-2d 1,518 (191811); Schaefer, v., Zoning Bid. of
<br />Adjustment, 62, Pa. Commw. 104, 435 A.2d 289 (1981); Glad hue v. Marcotte, 141
<br />Vt. 238 446 A.2d 375, (11982); Goldstein v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of
<br />Hempstead, 113 Misc. 2d 756, 449 N.Y. '.2d 910 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1,982); Radnor
<br />Industries, Lt id. v. Zoning Heaning, Bid., of Radnor Tp., 7'5 Pa. Commw. 397, 461 A.2d
<br />134,3 (1,9183); Lipari v. Zoning Hearing Bid. of City of'Eas,ton, 5116 A.2d 110 (Pa.
<br />Coirnmw. 191816Y.,
<br />1918,Haynoes v., City ofTluesonii, 7'84 P.2d. 715 (Ariz. 19891) (grant of variance
<br />overturned, where special circumstances related only to landowners' plan to construct
<br />an overly large restaurant),. R-N'-R, Assoc. v. Zoning Bid. of Review,, 100 R.I. 71, 210
<br />A.2d 653 (19165).-1 an Hoven v. Zoning Bid. of Warwick Tp.,, 60, Pa. Commw. 459,
<br />431 A.2d 11,69 (1981); Richardson v. Town of Salisbury, 1,23 I.H. 93v 455 A.2d
<br />1,0�59 (1983).; Martel v. City, off 'Vancouver (Wall Bid., of Adj'ustm,enit,, 35 Wash. App.
<br />2503, 666 F 21d 9�16 (1983).
<br />991gnelzi v. Zoning Bid. of Adjustment, 611 Pa,. Commw. 101, 433 A.2d 158
<br />(1'981); Pollard. v., Zoning Bid., of Appeals, 1861 Conn. 32, 4318 A- 2d 1186 (1982);
<br />Matter ofiSchrader., 660 P.2d 135 (Okla. 1983); Gardner v., City of Harahan, 504 So,
<br />2d'i 1107 ('La,. Ct. Apip. 19,87).
<br />(Release #5, 2/91)
<br />
|