Laserfiche WebLink
KAI <br />105 1 <br />Mia <br />M <br />0 <br />%, '1 !4 <br />The current ordm"ance prohibits rolof <br />signs., 71be 'issue of wall signs extending beyond the <br />clooflineis addressed M* the Placement of' Sips Section. <br />bi <br />Roof silps are not wanted m the City due, to aesthetic and safety, issues. WaR sips that <br />=tend over a, roof' fine are considered roof'signs. <br />I IT "I I 111 *14 3" 1 111 - ii!I�� <br />j tit) 11,1111110041) 1 <br />11 L III <br />4 9 0 <br />Although signs that extend over the rooffine are considered roof signs, this provision is <br />a <br />micluded m' a, separate section, ca.Ued "Placement of Sign,"'. It is unclear that', thi's type of -sign <br />is Prohibited. <br />I a 1 4 <br />�Lsj*j 03 P � <br />P <br />Change definitil"On of roof sign to state "any sign erected upon orprojecting, above the roof IiI <br />If a stmam to which ki U affued"19 Leave unchanged provision, that prohibits roof signs. mi <br />v IN klk*f <br />di <br />By M*cludmffig M* the roof sign, definition language regarding sips projectmg, over the roof fine, <br />@1 91 <br />it is much clearer that tht's tawme of sign, is prohibifted.1 <br />