Laserfiche WebLink
STANDARD <br />1 <br />x 20 <br />= Dces not xe =_t standard. <br />Dc tae elements cf this <br />2 <br />x 8 <br />= Mcst elements are below EStab11_ =_:� <br />facility /amenity meet <br />3 x <br />5 <br />standards. <br />adopted professional <br />3 <br />x 4 <br />= Standards are generally met. <br />standards? <br />4 <br />x 2 <br />= Few elements below standard <br />= No outside funding capabilities <br />5 <br />x 1 <br />= Meets current standards. <br />MAGNITUDE OF USE <br />1 <br />x 100 <br />= Most used facility <br />How much is this facil- <br />2 <br />x 30 <br />= Extensive use area <br />ty /amenity used by ccm- <br />3 <br />X 12 <br />= Average Participant use <br />munity demonstratinc <br />a <br />x 14 <br />= Light participant usage- <br />reed for project and <br />5 <br />x 2 <br />= LeasT used facility <br />pctentia? wearc� factor? <br />ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT <br />1 <br />x 60 = <br />No envircr3ental effect. <br />If this area is upgraded <br />2 <br />x 21 = <br />Few environmental effects. <br />will there be any detri- <br />3 <br />x 9 = <br />Limited environmental concerns <br />mental effect on the en- <br />4 <br />x 3 = <br />Several potential effects on <br />vircnment or natural <br />environment <br />resources? <br />5 <br />x 1 = <br />Very adverse effect <br />COST EFFECTI'VE <br />Will proposed upgrades <br />maximize monies spent or <br />should project wait for <br />future redevelopment at <br />a cost effective time? <br />USE OF OUTSIDE FUNDS <br />Does this project lever- <br />age additional funding <br />through grants or dona- <br />tions, thus maximizing <br />PIP funds? <br />pra INTENANCE <br />Does the condition of <br />the facility or the <br />original construction <br />methods used require <br />on- going, extensive . <br />maintenance activity? <br />1 x <br />30 <br />= Mcst cost effective <br />2 x <br />10 <br />= Will provide good cost benefit <br />regular basis - <br />ratio. <br />3 x <br />5 <br />= Av =_race cost per benefit ratio <br />4 x <br />2 <br />= Limited cost benefits <br />5 x <br />1 <br />= Le=__ - =t cost effective <br />1 x <br />80 <br />= High outside potential funding <br />2 x <br />32 <br />= Considerable outside furdinc <br />regular basis - <br />potential J <br />3 x <br />14 <br />= Outside funding potential <br />4 x <br />3 <br />= Liaited outside funding opportun- <br />lar basis <br />3'x <br />ities <br />5 x <br />1 <br />= No outside funding capabilities <br />1 <br />X <br />90 <br />= Extensive maintenance required on <br />regular basis - <br />2 <br />x <br />25 <br />= Extra maintenance rewired on regu- <br />lar basis <br />3'x <br />11 <br />= Regular maintenance but no special <br />remairement <br />4 <br />x <br />4 <br />= Very little maintenance necessary <br />5 <br />x <br />1 <br />= No main' "enance required <br />(5) <br />