Laserfiche WebLink
CONTROLS OVER FRAUD AND ABUSE 79 <br />Bia,sed on our conclusion that the current state auditinLy nresence does not en- <br />i Vi ;'JL <br />sure, even minimal compliance vAth state law, and, rules, and that local <br />41 <br />enforcement, is, not, very extensive, we recommend: <br />The state should establish a program, of on-site compliance auditing <br />ill <br />ofgainbli. I n,g organizations. <br />0 <br />Both, tax audits and compliance review's should be targeted, with more <br />41 ip, <br />frequent re�iqews, of'larger of rganizations, <br />In addition, we beli'leve the Department of Revenue should develop a pro- <br />gram of conducting tax audits blasied on audit', selection cntena that target <br />9i <br />organizations wiith, the gre <br />atest risk. <br />d 4 <br />off d <br />d F all <br />01 <br />1 ,ISM 0 <br />NP <br />jo <br />AW <br />0 <br />Both, tax audits and compliance review's should be targeted, with more <br />41 ip, <br />frequent re�iqews, of'larger of rganizations, <br />In addition, we beli'leve the Department of Revenue should develop a pro- <br />gram of conducting tax audits blasied on audit', selection cntena that target <br />9i <br />organizations wiith, the gre <br />atest risk. <br />