My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1990_0226_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1990
>
1990_0226_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2011 3:05:27 PM
Creation date
11/3/2011 2:55:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
T'ho�m�as and Mary Sh�or't,, Case No. 2052 <br />msa <br />would appear from that perspective, that the apipl,ican�ts have a right to <br />dlivi,de the land if appropriate street frontage and utilities are available. <br />Attached is a copy olf the base, map, of this area of the City where we <br />have indicated the property in question. You will •not,ice the existing <br />lots that were double frontage that have been preivioiusly divided to the <br />welst on the north side of Burke Aveinue . You will note that the lots <br />on elit,her side of the pro,p�erty, in question have not been divided as yet. <br />Engineering Considerations <br />Policy Considerations <br />The minimum lot width and area as established by the <br />Zoning Ordinance <br />are normally' apipilied to new subdivisions of land <br />for single-family <br />purposes. Uriless there are extenuating circumstances <br />making a <br />particular lot difficult or unreasonable to develop, the <br />developer has the <br />right, to plat, a lot as longs as it meets or exceeds the minimum <br />requiraments. Availability of utilities, vehicular <br />circulation, soil <br />conditions, and protection of the environment are important factors as <br />weill. Recently,, land divisions *in Roseville in residential areas) for <br />,small leftover parcels, often referred to as "infilling", <br />frequently do not <br />�meet the normal standards, but are, usually approved <br />if the lots are <br />111reasonably in scale "' with other development in the <br />area. Prior to <br />1959, the minimurn lot size in Roseville was 75 feet,. <br />Therefore, there <br />are many such lots (and smaller) in the area,. <br />Zoning Ordinance Referencies <br />The minimum, single-family lot st,andlards, are stated in Section 7.290 <br />Paragraph 5 as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.