Laserfiche WebLink
Dayton- Hudson Corporation, Case, No. 20518 Page 2 <br />requesting that the City grant, a variance so as tee keep the curb line <br />located, where it isal This results in a, setback of approximately 7 feet <br />ve�rs�us the, 15-foot, reqIuiried., <br />Area of' Expanded New Tenant Bldg <br />Peniney's: <br />Carson"sM '.1 <br />Ward's: <br />New Dayton's: <br />TOTAL, AREA., <br />Total Parking Capacity.* <br />Pia�rking Ratio: <br />Kgmahwj 11 <br />39,7100 <br />164,772 <br />Sq. <br />Ft. <br />16,91,31,3 <br />Sqi, <br />Ft,, <br />1491�9O�6 <br />Sqv <br />Fte <br />257,194 <br />Sq. <br />Ft. <br />1113i89885 <br />Sq, <br />Ft. <br />6,157 Cars <br />5.,41 Cars Per, 1,000 Sq* Ft. <br />A vieiw of the site will con�f'irm that the ex"Isting curibing in this area <br />of the pariking area in question was solmeihiow originally constructed with <br />an asphalt, curb,, which 'is currently larg�ely deteriorated. This is the <br />lon�ly, cu�rb in the eind.rei shopping area, complex that, appears to be <br />cionst,ructed in asphalt, though we do, not know why., Thus, it Is not a <br />question of retailing the exi,stiing curb, but, one of retaining the existing <br />dimensions oif the parking area so as to rebuild the curb in its current <br />lociation., <br />