|
Rosewai Cor,pora,t 'lion, Ca,sie No. 2063
<br />F,
<br />i � .
<br />The existing devielopment has 23 parking spaces th are setback
<br />at 30 fee
<br />from the public right-of-way (southi side of Oakciriest)l. the structur
<br />were utilized entirel,yi for retail safes, the plarki,ng req�uirement would b
<br />1 1
<br />14.361 x 5 - 71 spaces. Furniturei storesY having a low intensity us
<br />i
<br />actually requ�i,rie far leisis parking than the 5 per 1,0�00 square feet.
<br />The,
<br />.iii licantis proposed to add an additional 7 spaces in the front of
<br />'the stiore as in�dicated 'in the sitle plan.1 Under the Ordinance, this iz.
<br />yerfectly permissible si,nciel the requitried setb�ack f'ori the parking is 15
<br />feelt. There 'is approximately a 381-,f'oot space f riom the easterly
<br />pert, line to thie driiviewlay serving this front parking ariea.
<br />'Y 11
<br />T rie is an existing fence
<br />piroper,ty, which is in need of
<br />this f'en�ce and maintain ft at,
<br />future. The applicants propose
<br />sidle of the parking lot, which
<br />but certainly will enhance the
<br />Exterior Elevations
<br />t1iong the siouth and west side of the
<br />repair., The applicants propose to repair
<br />0
<br />its presien�t location and design for the
<br />tiol add five additional t,rees on the north
<br />arie not intended tio function as screening,
<br />appearance of the site.
<br />The existing structure has a, ston�ei surifa,ce. The, applicants propose to
<br />leave the stoine on, the front where most of tihe lower two-thirds of the
<br />height of the structure (as, shown in yellow in thilei drawing in the
<br />r churie) and add Panels of wihite stucco in the uppler area. On one of
<br />thile back sheets of the brochure, there *is a, drawing • the front
<br />elevation as it is priopolseid tio be renovated,
<br />Attached is a copy of a m�emo from the Engineering Department dated
<br />M�a,rch 210, 19910 noting that the, storm s�eweir system does not connect •
<br />thie parking lot. In a new deveilopment, ' it would be reiquired to bring a
<br />storm sewer into the, parking lot, so as to prevein,t the runoff from
<br />draining down the driveways to the street,. This concern should be
<br />disciussed w,ith the appliciant at thei public hearin,g�.
<br />® engineering report also notes a necessity for a sidewalk along th7.-.
<br />i
<br />e a
<br />n�ort,h and elasit s,idi of the structure
<br />CONCLUSION
<br />The
<br />land 'is zoned Limitied Business
<br />and certainly should be occupied by
<br />low
<br />'intensity uses such
<br />as those
<br />that, are permitted in that district.
<br />Thi's
<br />site cannot be used
<br />for reitail
<br />sales si,n�ce it is not zoned
<br />B-4,
<br />or shopping center.
<br />Though the proposed furniture store 'is a retail
<br />u�se,
<br />it, would be allowed
<br />only as a
<br />special use, therefore, the retail use
<br />could
<br />not be expan�d�ed
<br />or changed
<br />to any otheir use if a Special Use
<br />Permit
<br />'is isisued foiri thel,
<br />furniture store
<br />only,
<br />
|