My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0110_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0110_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2011 4:15:18 PM
Creation date
11/4/2011 4:03:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment E <br />Moss &Barnett <br />A Professional Association <br />November 17, 2010 <br />VIA E-MAIL <br />Mr. Bryan Lloyd <br />Associate city Planner <br />City of Roseville <br />Planning Commission <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br />Re: Interim Use Application for 2295 Walnut Street <br />Our File No.: 51429.2 <br />Dear Mr. Lloyd: <br />We are writing on behalf of Gladstone Commercial corporation and its affiliate UC06 Roseville <br />MN, LLC, ("Gladstone "} the owner of the office building at 2501 Walnut Street (2470 Highcrest) <br />to comment about the Meritex Enterprises, Inc., application for an Interim Use to allow a rubble <br />pile to remain at 2295 Walnut. The rubble pile is directly across the property fine from our <br />client's building. The pile detracts from the area. It should not become a permanent feature of <br />the area. Meritex should remove the rubble. However, Gladstone recognizes that the rubble is <br />the product of demolition of a building on the site, and that as an alternative to removing the <br />rubble to another site, Meritex is working to sell the rubble as base material for construction <br />projects. The rubble will be removed in connection with the sales. Gladstone agrees with staff <br />that the Interim Use is a sensible way to regulate the maintenance of the pile and to ensure its <br />removal by a date certain (e.g. October 31, 2011). Therefore, Gladstone has no objection to <br />the approval of the proposed Interim Use as long as all the conditions in the staff report are <br />included. Additionally, the city should consider conditions relating to dust control with respect <br />to the site and the trucks that remove the rubble. It should also be clear that there will not be <br />any on -site crushing of the rubble. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for taking a practical approach to balancing the <br />needs of the property owner with that of its neighbors and the larger community. <br />Ve truly yours, <br />r <br />Paul B. Zisla <br />Attorney At Law <br />P: (612) 877 -5328 <br />ZislaP@moss-barnett.com <br />PBZ /cag <br />1699800v1 <br />4800 WELLS EARGO CENTER 1 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4129 <br />P:6 12-877-5000 P:6 12-877-5999 W;mss- - barnett.corn Page I of I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.