2011_0110_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Member Olson asked for details on g�u�est parking space. Thornas Paschke explained possible spaces foir-- t four additional spaces with screening and land�sc,a�pling. Member Olson asked for details of the fences on the existing property l�ine (to be removed) as well as vegetation. (Most to be removed) Chair Klau�s,in�g asked for further details on parking for guests, and code requirements for guest parking. Hi ,fflso asked for location of the fencing. 0 Member Wilke asked for details of the St. Anthony approvals — nothing would be approved in Roseville until St. Anthony approves., Member Egli asked for examples of similar situationIs of PUDs in two, cities, (None available) Chair Klausin�g asked for, details of the reasoning for a PUD. Could the developer build without a variance What is, being done to be different from normal code requirements? (Geneiral ly five-foot setbacks for driveways are required.) Chair I d ked for, details of the PUD process. does the Planning Commission review this only once? M�ember Olson asked for details of the asphalt th�a,t is two feet from the property lined, the building 'I's 16" to 18' from the east (rear) property line, Member Egli asked if there, was a sidewal k on Old County Road 8? VVII there be 11 nkage or pathway connecting the two properties and the pond? She explained her concern for the view of the project from the condom�iniums. Can there be better screening?" (There is five feet of planting space.) Mr. Mathern said that a choice of trees, evergreens and shrubs is possible half-stolry tuck-under.? (No, tuck-iunders require more steps) Mathiern said steps requ�ire a different buyer. Chair Klausing asked what the market price wilill be? Mathem explained the market price will be $159,001 to $180t000. Member Wilke asked if the fire staff has reviewed. (Yes, suggests a h�ydrant at the east end of the sIite) Fill fit