|
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
<br />OF CITY COUNCIL
<br />CITY' OF ROSEVILLE
<br />RMSEY COURTYp X,INNES,OTA
<br />I
<br />Pursuant to due call, and, notice thereof a regular meeting on the City
<br />,Council of the C 'in ty of Roseville, Minnesota, was duly held min the C ity
<br />Hiall on the twenty-f ifth day of junie, 119190 at 7:30 o-*clock pm.
<br />T I a
<br />rhei followl" n,g m,embieris were, present .
<br />a
<br />,and the f ol,l,ow ing were absent .
<br />0
<br />introduced the, following resolution and moved its
<br />Counc 11-1member,
<br />aidopt Lion:
<br />N
<br />Whereas, pursuant, to advertisement for bids for the 'improvement,
<br />according, to the plans and specifications thereof on file in the office
<br />of the Manager of saijA Cityl, said bids werei received on June 19,, 1990,0
<br />,at 1,1,:010 o'clock am.,, opened and tabulated according to law and
<br />the following bids were received complying with the advertisement..
<br />BIDDER AMOUNT
<br />Ash,bla,ch Construction Company $603,712*811,
<br />Midwest, Asphalt Corporation $6351012a45
<br />i ion of St. Pul M -
<br />WHEREAS it appears, that A shbach Co n struct IN a . innesota
<br />is the lowest responsible, biidder atthe tabulatpdprioce of $603,712.80,,
<br />KOW, THEREFOREj BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
<br />Roseviille,, Minnesota: m
<br />1,w The Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter
<br />A
<br />into a contract with Ashbach Construct lion for $603,712.80 in the
<br />name, of' the City of Roseville for the above improvements according
<br />to the plans and, spelcificat lions, thereof heretofore approved by the
<br />City Council and, on file in the officle of the City Manager.
<br />6
<br />2* 'The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to return
<br />forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids excep
<br />the deposits, of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder
<br />N
<br />shall be retainied, until contracts have been signed.
<br />The motion, was seconded by Councilmembler, and upon vote being
<br />41 N
<br />taken thereon., the following voted in favor thereof:
<br />and the following voted against:
<br />
|