Laserfiche WebLink
A <br />law <br />1% <br />4ij-W,,%P2CQ !j *TO) 4 DID 40 <br />Numbers, 1 through, 5 'in, the Attoirney " s letter are <br />41 a <br />,questions raised at the work session, <br />Number 6 was pose,di by, Mr. Bill Schrienke of the <br />Citiziens, Clounicill,, subsequent to the work session. <br />Ii <br />Numble,r 7 is proposed, new language for Section 6. <br />subidivisions 1 and 2. which was requested by the <br />Council. <br />Attachment No 2 is information regarding incompatible off i9ces <br />which was requested, by thie, Council. According to the League of <br />9 <br />Minnesota Cities, this information is the best currently available., <br />A <br />Attachment, No. 3 is Slectilions 1 through 6 of the Citizens Council <br />Proposed Code showing changes suggested by the staff, 'including <br />111 0 <br />revised,language as recommended in the City Attorneyls letter. <br />Additions are undierillneld, deletions are crossed out, and comments <br />are, shown, 'in bold, priin,t,., <br />Because of the length, of the June, work, session, the Council decided <br />Ii 0 <br />to continuie, the Prioposied, Ethics Colde, to the july work sessionS it <br />was also diecided that each Council, Member should be contacted to <br />obtain any comments or suggestions regarding the draft of the Code. <br />Council Member johnsionfs suggestions will be reviewed at the work <br />sesisi ion . <br />0 "liF <br />1-9 <br />