|
,Ge�,rald K. Richardsi (Olive Glardeni), Case N�o.1 21071
<br />Buil - MateriaLl
<br />UMIM
<br />As part
<br />of' the
<br />redesign process,
<br />the applicants have changed the
<br />exterior
<br />building
<br />matiels. Ais Sheet
<br />A-2 il,lu�stra,tells, the principal
<br />exterior
<br />material
<br />isi now brick venieer,., Although they have not selected
<br />the final
<br />collors,
<br />we have Informed
<br />them that the Pla,n�ning Commission
<br />and City
<br />Council
<br />like the dark brick
<br />tones that, are present in t,he area.
<br />They stated that
<br />they would address
<br />this isslue at the meetin�g�.
<br />A standing seam meit,al roof 'is sholwn along the front and, two-thirds. of
<br />the side eleivationsil. This metal roof is located above the, ca,nopy, which
<br />we under,stand will be a dark green color. The location of the canopy
<br />is, shown in Plan view on Sheet,
<br />The use of stucco has been, 11mited, to, the area immediately above t,h(;
<br />m, entrance
<br />ain . See the front elev-ation an Sheelt A-2.
<br />Another improvement 'in the, proposed plans is the inclusion of a triash
<br />handling, area within the building. The location of t,his addition to the
<br />I
<br />building is shown at the rear of the building. It is, the ligh�tl,y stippled
<br />rectangle 'immediately beillow the, word component on Sheet C-1.,
<br />The rear ellevation shows the location of the door to service this a,riea.
<br />This elevatiion also, sho�ws that, t,hi,s elevation will be coveiried with
<br />exactly the same exter,io�r, m�ateri,al,s as the rest of the building.
<br />I I
<br />We miet with the,, applicants and thieir architects and a,sikiied them' tx
<br />ove,r,l,a,y tihe landsca,pei and utiliiity plans and makel ceirtai,n that there ar
<br />no confli,ct,s. They should be prepare�d t,o offer this assura,n�cle at thf,-v
<br />meeting O
<br />We alsol Informed them that, the curbing surrounding the parking lot
<br />must be co�n�crete* They siaid that they understood that requirement, but
<br />It should. be clearly identified as such on the approved plans to avoid
<br />I
<br />the Potential for fu�t,ure miscommunication.
<br />I
<br />The, landscape plan has been modified. The, applicantsi continue to
<br />tmeint to landscapi
<br />indicate a, strong comml i i n g,, They propose a n
<br />arborvitae he around th�riel,e sides, of the,, lot.1 Green Ash are the
<br />4i
<br />piri,m�ar,y, overstory trees planted around the perimeter, with Honey L,ocust
<br />shown at, the, en�tra,nceis and 'in the parking lislandsO, F --..ensive ground
<br />cover and ornamental pla,nt,ingsi are proposed, around the buildingd,
<br />
|