Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 1/24/2011 <br />Item No.: 13 . a <br />Department Approval- City Manager A proval <br />, <br />Item Description: Discuss Process for 2011 Work Plan Priorities & Initiatives Sessions <br />=1L 11 <br />2 It is abest practice of governing bodies to annually meet to discuss and establish plans and <br />3 priorities for the upcoming yea s. In the past two years, the City Council and department heads <br />4, have met to discuss strategic plans and challenges/issues confronting the city and departments. <br />5 The Council has set aside two Mondays, January 31 't and February 7th to again engage in this <br />6 type of planning effort. In order to be most effective, the Council should agree upon the <br />"7 organization of the meeting, the outcomes expected, and what processes to follow to reach the <br />8 desired outcomes. <br />9 In previous years, the Council used the Imagine Roseville 2025 (IR 2025) Vision report as the <br />110 basis for determining the City emphasis that the staff would pursue. It is recommended that the <br />11 IR 2025 visioning continue to provide the basis for the Council deliberation and direction to <br />12 staff. As you may know, the IR 2025 report provided broad community goals and more specific <br />13 strategies. There are 15 broad goals categories and 49 goal subcategories and numerous <br />14, strategies. Staff believes that given direction from the City Council as to priorities among the <br />15 various strategies identified by IR 2025, that our departmental strategic plans can identify <br />116 subsequent specific action steps to further the strategies. In this way, the City Council and staff <br />1 "7 will set the priorities for the next several years, and have specific action steps that will result in <br />11 111"":1'11 budget supported implementation — consistent with the community vision. <br />119 It is suggested that a process whereby the Councilmembers rank the strategies per each goal <br />20 category will result in a composite ranking for each IR 2025 goal area. Using those rankings, <br />2 1 the top 3 or 4 strategies would become the basis for development of 5 year strategic plans by <br />22 departments. Those plans can be developed by staff during the next two months, in advance of <br />23 the budget cycle. The plans would serve to implement Council priorities during the next two <br />24, years and beyond. <br />25 The staff could also rank strategies, as an aid to Councilmembers. Council could then complete <br />26 their ranking prior to the 1/31 meeting, at which time staff would report on the composite <br />27 Council rankings, the Council could have a discussion to confirm the rankings as staff direction, <br />28 and the process could be completed relatively quickly. <br />29 The remaining time could be spent discussing priorities for 2011. This would include priorities <br />3o by staff and initiatives/suggestions by Councilmembers. This type of interactive discussion has <br />3 i been appreciated by both Councilmembers and staff. <br />32 <br />Page I of 2 <br />