Laserfiche WebLink
go <br />.I.Dage 71 <br />Assessments <br />Auguat 2117 j, 199111, <br />F1 or this item,, the council wished to have the staff explore whether <br />the watierma,in cost could be passed on, to the CanAm developer and <br />asked us 'to, provide soinie chronologJcial, information regarding the series <br />of events which led • the need to relocate the watermai'n. <br />ffil <br />We have reviewed the CianAm development agreement with Craig Waldron, <br />`tYi deveilopment director, it is, his opinion that the agreement <br />communi <br />does not provide a means to charge, the extra watermain cost to the <br />1 0 <br />Ca,nAm dev,e,l,lope,r, Accordingly, 'it will be necessary to finance this <br />extra cost through special assessments and some city participation, if <br />necessary. <br />Regard,ing the sequence of events relating to the construction of the <br />cul-die-sac . 'it is dif f 'in cult to actually determi ne specif ic dates and <br />responsibility,. However, we would note the following schedule of <br />eveIts: <br />Jan. 9,, 1989 City council received petition from CanAm <br />116 <br />,and George Rel ing <br />Feb 1 61 1 <br />1989 Preliminary print receoved from CanAm of site <br />plan showing proposed grading of County Road C-.'_1 <br />4 <br />[Aar.-I, 20, 1989 Feasibility report completed by SEH (watermain <br />raising not addressed) <br />May 5 r 19 8 91 IMINIGINNO Plan completed by SEH (watermain to be raised) <br />juhle 5. 1,989 Bids opened I <br />June ,12, 1,1989 Contract awarded, to Midwest Asphal), <br />ii <br />