Laserfiche WebLink
III <br />opinion is that the oro 'ect will have only ma 1 1 ct on <br />I mini ma. <br />traf fic on, Ricie Street, and Minnesota �Street. See the repor-ts f rom <br />r-4-1-enshoof andi Associ"' ates, Inc. which have been provi" ded to the City- <br />I%r.'.w <br />As recently as 1988, the Minnesota Supreme Court,, in Swanson <br />v. Cil'ity-of Bloomincfton 421 N.Wa21d, 301 (Minn. 1988) reitera-te­d-----t-h"e <br />I# s-i s-1' f o'Ir-i- de't- <br />erminingi whether a city council's actions will <br />1 be <br />u,lDheld, bv the court uDion riev" The standard of review is whether <br />the city councill'si actions were reasonable. is there a "reasonable <br />a <br />basis for the decision"11 or is the decision "unreasonablet arbitrary <br />A I <br />and capriclilouis.111 <br />Dienial of a, sl3ecial, use -permit is arbitrary if it is <br />established by the dieveloper that all standards ppecifted by the <br />iii ridinance as a condon of granting the permit application have <br />Lie en mie t S c ol t t -CP un ty 10 <br />_j�umbler..Comp4ny., Inc <br />417' N.,W.2do 7121 (MiLnn. App, 1988' WRI <br />) 1. <br />