1990_0924_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

James Gilbert,/C.W. Hal,v,erso Case No. 21510 Page 2 Emma! The applicant has stated that- he does not befievel the proposed changezd', -jr ill adversely affect t,hei approved landscape plan. A copy of thill wi i relvised landscapel plan shou�ld have been submitted with this applicat, I ion, however, and a rev,i,sed plan must, be preparled as, a riecord copy of thz ng�e is allowied �pproved landscape plan, if this chai No screening was required in the approveld P'UD. There was, however, a, fence shown on the approved site pla,n (dated 12/311,/87), This fence is niot, shown on the revised plants and th,ey should be to add this fence., The portion Iin the northeast corner, -amended oif the lot must be designed to be opened by the Fire Department in the case of an emerigiency. Engineerin Considerations 1* The proposed drainage plan will have water standing unless an ,additional catch blasi,n is installed at the northern end of the lot. 2., Carle needs to be taken tot assign address to the new buildings that meet City sta,nd'iards. Fire Marshal Considerations, i ng ne I Emergiency open"' leded in fencile at the niortheaslt end of the site to 1 1 4D facilitate emergency accessi The proposed �am,endmenit to thel, a,pprioved planned unit development relpresients a, relatively minor change.., It is doubtf ul Lhat the small incirease in these buildin�gs wc)uld even be ounding properties. �rs that should be addressed in the review of this Therel are sorne matte applications The fence, n�eeds to be add�ed�, as showln on the approved.. plans. The l,andscape plan neledsil to be reidrawin with the enlarged buildings on i,t. An add'itional catch basin should, be added at the north end of the loit, as suggestied by the Engineering Department.