Laserfiche WebLink
ERWIN k PETERSON <br />ROBERT C BELL <br />WiLLARD L CONVERSE <br />ROGER A. JENSEN <br />KURT F. WAILTHER <br />MARTIN J. COSTELLO <br />JAMES C. ERICKSON <br />DAVID S. ANDERSON <br />'THOMAS 01, McCORMICK* <br />WILLIAM M, DRINANE <br />CAROL & BALDWIN <br />101 77 B. CROSSMAN <br />DAVID R. FENSKE <br />CAROLINE BELL BECKMAN <br />`ALSO ADMI=DIINI WIISCXD141SAIN <br />W." Vvel Eel M; f W <br />PETERSON, BELL, CONVERSE & JENSEN - <br />ST. PAUL, OFFICE <br />21�00 AMERICAN NATIONAL B�ANK BUILDING <br />101 EAST FIFTH STREET <br />T. PAUL, MINK TA 551101 <br />TELEPHONE (1612) 224-4,703 <br />FAX (612)223-8070 <br />City Coluncil <br />City of Roseville <br />1j1 Center Driv <br />Roseville, MN 5511,311 1 <br />ROSEVILLE OFFICE <br />2780 NORTH SNELLING AVE., SUITE 327 <br />ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 <br />TELEPHONE (612) 631-8489 <br />FAX (612)1631-2475 <br />September 211 1991 <br />Re Eleanor Gillespie v. City, o <br />Our le Nol. 1011.48 <br />REPLY TO: <br />Roseville <br />Our opinioni, is as previously expire,sseld.., If there 'is an appeal, <br />there is a substanti,al likelihood of the Appeallate Court <br />reviersing the District Court,, I hiave, discussed this matter with <br />Bill Clapp of the Attorney Generall's office and he has cited the <br />following cases <br />Hedlund vft City olf Ma lewood 366, N.W.2d 6240 Tuckner v. <br />T *jF 419'N.W.2d 8316; and Castle Diesi2p v. City of Lake Elmo, 39 <br />N.W.s2d 578* In, al,l, of these cases, the Court of Appeals <br />sustal"'ned, the shoreland, ordinancies from various attacks. I <br />However, i,t is dill-scretionary with the council whether or not this <br />is appea,led. If no appeal is taken,, nio adverse precedent <br />w ull be set,. <br />Very truly yours, <br />PETERSON, BELL, CONVERSE &,JENSEN <br />Robert C. Bell <br />ap <br />2= <br />