Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 2,8, 2008 <br />Page 14 <br />Attachment B <br />Councilmember Roe questioned if the referenced studies, discussed how wide the <br />perceived impact on property values, was, realized, or if it was, just in the immedi- <br />ate vicinity of a pawnshop. <br />Kelly Knight, 2,071 Midlothian Road <br />Ms,. Knight spoke in opposition to the application for a pawnshop, noting that she <br />and her husband had firsthand experience on how opportunistic crime rises, during <br />an economic downturn, when someone had attempted to gain entrance to their <br />home, forcing them to install a security system. Ms,. Knight also opined that a <br />pawnshop would decrease residential property values, in their immediate area fur- <br />ther opined that a pawnshop would make it easier for opportunistic criminals, to <br />get rid of items,. Ms,. Knight advised that her family had made a significant in- <br />vestment in their property, inside and out, based on their assurance that theirs, was, <br />a safe community. Ms,. Knight advised that she had visited a pawnshop, after re- <br />ceiving Mayor Klaus,ing's, response to her e-mail opposing the project, and opined <br />that she remained unimpres,s,ed after her observations,. Ms,. Knight referenced a <br />recent Star/Tribune article related to pawnshops,, and opinions, ex pyres ,see by a de- <br />tective on the additional resource costs,, and additional regulatory legislation to <br />monitor this type of business, and questioned impacts, to the City's, budget for ad- <br />ditional police. <br />Discussion ensued between Councilmembers, and Ms,. Knight regarding linking <br />and identifying sellers, and merchandise; current City Code not limiting the num- <br />ber of pawnshops, in the city; whether the City was, being naive and needed to do <br />more due diligence and ask more questions,- general increase in crime and if it was, <br />directly related to pawnshops,- with the public not having the burden of proof on <br />impacts, of proposed land use on general health, welfare and safety issues. <br />Ms,. Knight concluded by noting that she had initially been insulted by the letter <br />from the applicant; and then concerned with their poor example expressed in the <br />letter of merchandise received; and expressed her concern with property values, <br />and crime on the north end of County Road B <br />Mayor Klausing identified his intent in seeking additional and specific informa- <br />tion from residents, related to their concerns,, in an effort to addres,s, those facts,, not <br />just perceptions,. <br />Todd Anderson, Midlothian Road <br />Mr. Anderson advised that he was, a bus,ines,s, owner in town, as well as the father <br />of three children walking to Brimhall School, and questioned why it was, so im- <br />portant to license a pawnshop at this location. Mr. Anderson advised that he had <br />attempted to contact each Councilmember, and thanked Councilmember IhIan for <br />talking to him. Mr. Anderson expressed concern for his children walking to Brim- <br />hall with the pawnshop in that immediate area. <br />