Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br /> of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 24th day of October 2011 at 6:00 <br /> p.m. <br /> The following Members were present: McGehee; Willmus: Johnson; Pust; and Roe; <br /> and none were absent. <br /> Council Member Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 10943 <br /> A RESOLUTION APPROVING OUTDOOR STORAGE AS A CONDITIONAL USE AT <br /> 2360 COUNTY ROAD C (PF11-025) <br /> WHEREAS, BHJN, LLC, applicant for approval of the proposed conditional use, owns <br /> the property at 2435-2459 Rice Street, which is legally described as: <br /> PIN: 08-29-23-21-0012 <br /> Gateway West Business Center—Roseville,Lot 1 Block 1 <br /> WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br /> proposed CONDITIONAL USE on October 5, 2011, voting 7-0 to recommend approval of the use <br /> based on the comments and findings of the staff report prepared for said public hearing; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has determined that approval of the proposed <br /> CONDITIONAL USE will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding properties based on the <br /> following findings: <br /> a. While outdoor storage as proposed might not advance the goals of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan aside from representing continuing investment in an <br /> industrial property, it does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan; <br /> b. The proposed use is not in conflict with a Regulating Map or other adopted plan <br /> because no such plans apply to the area surrounding the property; <br /> c. The proposed use is not in conflict with City Code requirements since permits will <br /> not be issued if the plans fail to meet all of the relevant requirements and, <br /> moreover, the conditional use approval can be rescinded if the use or the property <br /> fails at any time to comply with all applicable Code requirements or conditions of <br /> the approval; <br /> d. The proposed outdoor storage essentially represents expanded capacity of the <br /> existing building material distribution use, and so should not intensify any <br /> practical impacts on parks, streets, or public infrastructure; <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br />