My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1990_1210_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1990
>
1990_1210_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2011 3:13:55 PM
Creation date
11/10/2011 3:01:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE*# 12/10/90 <br />MTY Manager Reviewed: <br />01W <br />1, lip, oval <br />9 L <br />ITEM NO. <br />Ill <br />Item Yeisc3�iptioln: Public Improvement Hearing, County Road B from Dale <br />Street to a point 1,,,200 feet east of Ricellill, 89-17 <br />40 <br />Background:; The improlvement project �f'or County Road B from Dal-e to a <br />point 1,1,200 feet east, of Rice was initiated by Ramsey County as part of <br />,its Capital Improvement Program. The feasioblelity report was authorized <br />by Ramsey County approximately two years ago. various public meetings <br />Ill 41 is 0 <br />providing public input, have been held, since that time, The attached <br />feasibility reilpioirt contains a schedule of those events. <br />Sitate statute requires, a formal public hearing for city council. to order <br />this projileict,. The council, has already approved the county"s feasibility <br />study for the prio,jecitii and city staff has drafted our own feasibility <br />report describing, the, local improvement.1 <br />al <br />The attachied feasibility, report describes various alternates considered <br />for tihell project, land recommends a single alternate. <br />Alternatilvesoo Alternatives for County Road B pro-ect have been <br />9i I <br />,discussed at length during the public involvement process and also <br />descri,jole,d in the county,'s feasibility study. Alternatives that could be <br />10 <br />,considered at, this time include the, following: <br />A 42�ll wide interim section with, 5101 widths at major intersections <br />to handlie higher traffic volumes (recommended compromise alternate) <br />2. A continuous 5101 wide roadway, (original recommended alternate) <br />3. Do nothing (no-build alternateo <br />VA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.