|
PLANNING, REP,oR,T
<br />DIATE,•
<br />MIM -M rM MEN W
<br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS*
<br />* I
<br />Tanury Development
<br />I
<br />Rosedale Commons
<br />Shopping
<br />Center, 2480 Fairview Avenue
<br />North (see sketch)
<br />the
<br />Special Use Permit
<br />for a;&.
<br />Amended Site Plan
<br />to Allow
<br />the Construction
<br />of Two
<br />Monument Signs
<br />of the
<br />This
<br />is an
<br />a,ppli,catioin to arnend the Special, Use
<br />erm�it that authorized
<br />the
<br />existing
<br />sitel plan for the Rosedale Co,m�moins,
<br />site. Specifically, this
<br />application
<br />would authorize the installation of
<br />two monument signs at
<br />two
<br />of the
<br />entrances to this site that were not
<br />shown on the approved
<br />site
<br />plan.
<br />is a copy
<br />of the new standards
<br />Four exhibits, have, been submitted by the project architects to illustrate
<br />this proposal. They include a sifte, plan illustrating the locations of the
<br />proposed monuments, a scaled, elevation ifflustrating the design of the
<br />proposed signs a,nd the materials tha,t they will, be constructed of, and
<br />enlarged details of each of' the specific locations.
<br />The subject, property is located in the
<br />SC Shopping Center
<br />District
<br />(Chapter 9, Ro�selville Code).
<br />Section 1 0l of the code contains the
<br />regulations for signs in the SC
<br />District. Also relevant in this discussion
<br />groiund signs would allow these signs to be
<br />is the amendments to Chapter
<br />14, recently
<br />recommended by the
<br />Planning
<br />Commission th,a,t, have yet to
<br />be formally
<br />adopted by the City
<br />Council.
<br />Also attached for your, review,
<br />is a copy
<br />of the new standards
<br />related
<br />to ground signs.
<br />height
<br />limit included
<br />in the
<br />Shopping Center Districts may have as,
<br />many
<br />as three pylon
<br />signs.
<br />There, are currently two piyloin signs on the,
<br />site.
<br />The new standard for
<br />groiund signs would allow these signs to be
<br />set ba, e-half the
<br />normal
<br />,pylon seltback disitance, bu�t they must
<br />also contain
<br />no more than
<br />one-half the all,o�w,ed sign area. The apiproval of
<br />this application
<br />would
<br />eissentially trade the third avallable pylon
<br />sign
<br />for two ground
<br />signs.
<br />These ground', signs wou�ld co�mpl,y wi,th the
<br />height
<br />limit included
<br />in the
<br />tew standards.
<br />Since,, the, new, sign ordinance modifications have not, been approved by
<br />the City Council,, this application must be reviewed under the current
<br />code., Fortunately the current, Shopping Center, District standards include
<br />sio�mei provisions that al,l,o�w so�me flexibility, One of the first issuez-
<br />relates to sietbacksi. Technically sincel th�e new setback standards have
<br />
|