Laserfiche WebLink
K <br />S 0 <br />o Does the reclommended. action make sense economical! <br />MI 9 <br />o Is there a betteralternar3-vq? <br />o Does the recom ICI end,ed,action ' reduce. yard waste and <br />III <br />increase, 'the generatov's AHareness of the associated <br />costs? <br />01 <br />Doles the riecommended action, reduce the element of <br />confusion for the, resident'? <br />o The Committee,"s recommendations, <br />01 Stiaf f response and riecommendati'lon, <br />0 4i <br />lo, A summarizi,ing table,.. <br />EVALUATTON <br />,General Pol310. CY <br />Recommendation 1.0 Roseville should, resume i*ts leadership role in <br />yard waste management by implementing the recommendations of this <br />,rieloorit. <br />dbP <br />Response: (ibimplement, with modification] The City is taking the <br />necessary steps to implement the Committee's recommendat ions by, <br />a <br />o Drafting this response to, the recommendations, <br />01 <br />Presenting this response tol the Committee, <br />10 Providing the City Council, with this response to review <br />at an upcomiong work sessionO <br />