Laserfiche WebLink
1*1 <br />o add equipment and personnel ,, o3; <br />a <br />o contract with private haulers, for part of the service. <br />III <br />The cost of provi"La"Ung 'the, current service is not inexpensive; <br />& a <br />191819il costs were $76,,371.34. if this recommendation is imple- <br />mented, the cost will increase by an estimated $13,000 (1989 <br />figures) for labolr and maintenance, plus the cost of a super Vac <br />at $20,F 1000, to 1000. - <br />WhijLe the ua upport for tI is program, 'it, does not favor raising taxes in <br />order to improve, the qu,al 16ty of the program. Theref ore it is <br />not recommended thiat,staff implement this recommendatilon at this <br />time,, but concentrate s on resolving the following <br />NIP <br />Committee recommiendat ion M <br />11 <br />Recommendation 2 fto Determine the mlosti cost ef f ect ive way to <br />con,t 116nue the Leaf Collection Program,, <br />The program needs improvement, yet to do so would result in con- <br />iderabl e cols,ts to the �Cit,y's e @ <br />s it 'is, therefor, important that <br />a <br />staff be directed to carefully situdy,the following. <br />o Eliminate the Leaf Collectillon, Program, and require resi- <br />dents to bleresponsloble for the disposal of leaves. <br />i <br />o El iminate the Leaf Clollect ion Program and contract the <br />entirle service out to independent haulers. <br />it is recommended that staff carefully scrutinize the available <br />41 <br />o ition,s G <br />1 41 <br />RecommendaU'Lon 3* Only those residents using leaf collection <br />servilces should play for them. <br />