Laserfiche WebLink
P�ff 9MV1191VA <br />Eugene Sc'hult,z <br />West, Side of' <br />Between Millwood and Brenner <br />Avenues (see sketch) <br />Subdivision of Pil,a,tte,d Lot <br />s Property has previously been proposed to be, divided by the <br />"dred at, the, AprI*l meetin�g of tihie Plnning <br />appliciant, and was e a last consi <br />Commission at, which time, 'it was proposed to d'ividei the existing 150 <br />foot, lot into two 75 foot lots and reltain the existing 50 foot lot. <br />2. You will recall that the applicant owns 21,00 feet o�f frontage on the <br />west side of Victoraa Street, consil'sting of an existiling 510 foot !at (witb <br />a <br />no house o n it)" a �d an existing 150 foot lot with a house on <br />appro xiiii mate ly the south half of that lot. All prievi i ous proposals ti <br />de the 20�O feet Into three lots in any form have been denied. <br />3 1 <br />M�rl. Schultz now proposes to d'IvIde the piro�perty into two lots only,, <br />The nortih lot would be 85 feet in width (the current minimum standard) <br />and the remag 1,15 feet would be a sin�gle l,o�t containing the <br />existing house. Thus, the existing 50 foot loit would be eliminated and <br />beicomeli part of' the new proposed foolt, width lot <br />50 Th�e <br />proposal iis to sim�ply divide the <br />2,00 feet of frontage 'into two <br />lots, <br />The <br />north lot would be 85 feet, and <br />the remainder would be 115 <br />feet. <br />M�r. <br />I <br />S'ch�ultz has attached a letter <br />outilining his proposal, noting <br />the <br />difficulty <br />of moving the house, so as <br />to divide the land Ontol two <br />100 <br />foot <br />lots. As - you know,, the lots to the sou,tih are 10�O feet "in w'idth <br />and <br />the immedi,a,te lots to the north <br />are 110 feet in width. <br />