|
July 1,7, 1989
<br />Page 2
<br />requirements, also do not allow Parkingi on the roadway itself at any time.
<br />0i
<br />He,n�ce,, t,h�e requirement for the extra 10 foot parking lane.
<br />Ramsey C�ounty policy is such that they will Pick upi 215% of this improvement.
<br />The remaini'ng 75% or $13,277 as estimated woul�d be, as,sessed directly to the
<br />benefited, propertieso In this case, th�el, total cost would be borne by the
<br />Pari sh .
<br />The July 10,, 1989, public imp�riovement heari , ng wia,s c,ontiinued until J�uly 24,
<br />19�89 by the Roseville City Councill so no final action, on these items has
<br />occur,red to dat". ,
<br />We f'elt it important to ou,tline these issues so that the Parish could react
<br />to it at or prior to the continued public hearing. In summary., the Parish
<br />e,
<br />must, cons ider
<br />1) Do they want the par-king lane and pay the casts associated with
<br />its cons tructi on-,
<br />2) Are they in favor of the Pathway (costs associated with it are
<br />picked up, through otheir City fund,s and are not directily a,ssiesse.,
<br />I
<br />to benefited p�rop�ertiies)�,
<br />We hope this outlines the issues faci'ng the Parish in conjunction with this
<br />p roi e,ci t,, If you h�a,ve any questions, please do not hesitate, to, call me at
<br />774-6021 oir Sit,eve Gatlin, Director of Public Works in Roseville Qt 490-221206
<br />0 -
<br />Yours truly,
<br />MAIER STEWART' & ASSOCIATES., INC.
<br />k 7S
<br />Thomas J. Madigan, P.E,,i
<br />Project Engineer
<br />TJM/ms
<br />C c Paul Klo,rkwold, Asst. County En�gin�eer Ram,seliy County (letter onlyl
<br />'I
<br />Waynei Leonard,, Coordinating Engineer Ramisey County (leitter only"
<br />Steve Gatlin, Director of Public Works Roselivi�ll,e (letter oin�ly)
<br />
|