Laserfiche WebLink
jr <br />L4tV Mn <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 8/28/89 <br />107 MW A <br />�C <br />hl <br />ITEM NO. : I C— t <br />Reports and Recommen dat 'ion I <br />item Descrim]�tioon:l Consideration of feasibility report for County Road B <br />4 <br />improvements,, Dale Street to a point 1200 feet east <br />of Rice Street, City Project No. ST-P-SW-89-17 <br />At the August 14,,, 1,98191,, regular city council meeting, the city council <br />considered the feasibility report for County Road B. In an attempt to <br />reach a compromise regarding roadway width'acceptable to the <br />a <br />neiahborhood and the city and county staffs the county engineer's <br />office proposed a 142-floot wide interiemsection. That section was <br />A <br />diescribed in a previous memorandum to the city council. <br />The neighborhood group requested additil'onal time to review the proposal <br />and to present 'it to all affected property owners along County Road B. <br />To alcicommodate the, neidl,cth► orls request ti he' city council continued action <br />on the feasibility report until the Auigusit.28, 1989, meeting. <br />1, Extent of grading for the full, 50-foot width,. How will,11 this be <br />done andin what time frame? <br />2 Parameters f or determining hardship relating to boulevard width. <br />1i <br />How is determination f or hardship, made <br />31, Preservation of obstructions. How will this be done and who will <br />,make the decision, regarding the removal of potential boulevard <br />I *I <br />obistructi, ions? <br />4 <br />.z. Request for consideration of stop sign at Western and County Road B; <br />a Oi Q <br />5. Channell zatiion at intersections for turning movements. <br />a vi <br />The neighborhood group, raised these, issues and concerns and hopes to <br />have them resolved either during the final feasibility report <br />11 <br />f!-reparation priocess or preliminary design. <br />