Laserfiche WebLink
should be more convenient. <br />Multi- family Complexes <br />Roseville is not providing recycling service to <br />most apartment, condo and townhome resi- <br />dents. Owners can contract with a private <br />company if they wish, but only about a third <br />do. Roseville has traditionally treated apart- <br />ments, condos and townhomes differently than <br />houses. But the State and Ramsey County <br />include these multi - family complexes in their <br />recycling requirements for cities. Additionally <br />Roseville has been charging multi- family <br />complex owners the City's recycling fee while <br />not providing any service. <br />Recommendation: <br />Committee members believe the City should <br />meet its goal to improve recycling efforts in <br />Roseville by including all apartment, condo <br />and townhome complexes in the City's pro- <br />gram. To ease the transition the committee <br />suggests this expansion be phased in adding <br />condos and townhomes first with apartments <br />to follow. And that complexes not be charged <br />until they receive service. <br />Residential Curbside Recycling <br />Committee <br />members found <br />two main ways <br />to do that based <br />on resident <br />needs: collect <br />recycling more <br />often or offer <br />better bins. <br />Residents <br />surveyed asked <br />that bins be larger, wheeled, covered or just <br />more of the current bins. <br />An intriguing program of putting all recycling <br />into a single, wheeled cart is just starting here <br />in Minnesota. While the program shows great <br />potential, there are some significant drawbacks <br />that must be overcome. Single stream recy- <br />cling processing has a higher rate of material <br />that is damaged and can't be recycled (called <br />residual). This can result in less material that <br />is actually recycled into new paper, cans or jars <br />even though more material may be collected. <br />Recommendation <br />The committee believes Roseville should do all <br />it can to meet its environmental goal to im- <br />prove the City's recycling efforts. However the <br />committee could not reach a consensus <br />whether the City should continue with the <br />current system while expanding and enhancing <br />public education campaigns, switch to every <br />week collection or should proceed with single <br />stream recycling collection. A list of the pros <br />and cons of each system is included in the full <br />report and Appendix B. Members wish to leave <br />it to the Council or a future committee to <br />decide. <br />Yard Waste <br />Minnesota banned putting yard waste in with <br />your garbage effective January 1, 1990. <br />In response to the ban Roseville required all <br />licensed garbage haulers to offer separate yard <br />waste and /or brush collection. <br />Most Roseville residents surveyed mulch their <br />grass and don't have to dispose of it. Twenty <br />percent compost yard waste in their back yard, <br />20% arrange a special pickup with their gar- <br />bage hauler and 14% take it to a free County <br />compost site. <br />Recommendation: <br />This system is working well and the committee <br />recommends the City continue requiring <br />garbage haulers offer yard waste pick up, while <br />enhancing and expanding education campaigns <br />to residents about the benefits of low mainte- <br />nance lawn care, mulching and composting. <br />