ERWIN A. PETERSON�
<br />ROBERT C BELL
<br />WILLARD L CONVERSE
<br />ROGER A. JENSEN
<br />KURT F. WALTHER
<br />W. TIMOTHY MALCHOW
<br />M ARTIN J, _ LLO
<br />JAMES . ERICKSON
<br />DAVID S. ANDERSON
<br />WILLIAM M. DRINANE
<br />PAMELA CONVERSE ZERIN
<br />CAROL A. BALDW'IN
<br />SC077 B. CROSSMAN
<br />DAVID, R. F'ENSKE
<br />CAROLINE F. BELL
<br />000%
<br />rETERSON, BELL., CONIVERSE & JENSEJ
<br />November 2 1, 19 81�1
<br />mr,011 Steven D .1 Gatl loin,
<br />Plubl ic 'Worksi D irector
<br />City of' Roseville
<br />1
<br />2660 Civic Center Drive
<br />Roseville, Minnesota, 55111
<br />REPLY TO:
<br />St . Paul
<br />Pro t No.1 ST-P-SW-89-1.7,r COUNTY ROAD B IMPROVEIMENTS
<br />Contract with Toltz, Duvall,, Anderson and Associates
<br />Our File No,, 1011-19
<br />0
<br />Dear Steve,41
<br />havie reviewed the proposed agreement between the I City of
<br />Roseville and TKDAI, as well a,s t,heilir author ization f or
<br />professiLo-nal seirvijcesi 411
<br />ontr a is In r
<br />-in, poper form and "is in order for execution by
<br />The cct
<br />th,ie Cnty a,
<br />Par,ag,ra,p,h, iiB,3,o should be amended, by striking the words "or for
<br />contractors failure to perform his, wiork 'in accordance with the
<br />con,tra,ct documents",,
<br />1i 4 9 0
<br />These disclaimers are not appropriate in that the engineer is
<br />reilil',e..ved of' a,n,y obligation to de,t,ect that -the contractor has
<br />failed to, pler,for,m up to the specifications which is the primary
<br />reason a pro,-lect representative/ inspector is provided by the
<br />enginleer
<br />9 # 6
<br />al,so know, f'rom experience that engineering companies Will
<br />attempt to 'insert, such disclaimers and will generally allow them
<br />to be stricken i,f they, are questioned.
<br />ZZ=
<br />
|